War of Words
Not just any words...search words:
Geico doesn't mind you Googling Geico, but when you do, it wants Google to tell you about Geico, not Allstate or AIG.

This is the crux of a lawsuit going to trial today in Virginia pitting the car insurer, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, against the search engine that says it wants to organize the world's information, information on car insurance included.

Geico sued Google in May claiming trademark infringement. The insurer says Google links ads from Geico's rivals to searches for "Geico" itself. This sending of Geico hunters to destinations apart from Geico hurts Geico, Geico says. But Google says what it does is perfectly legal, a form of "fair use" that does not violate Geico's intellectual property. It says that Geico may own Geico, but the word "Geico" is up for grabs.

This form of fair use is big business for Google. It makes the bulk of its revenue, which was $806 million in the third quarter, from selling ads that are targeted to search results. Thus, a search for "Geico" leads to Geico on the left side of the screen, but on the right side, there are "sponsored links" to AIGauto.com, onlinemarts.com and cheapercarinsurance.com. Google went public in August, raising $1.67 billion and its stock has soared since then.

If I were Google and should Geico go on to win this lawsuit, I would definitely protect myself from further damages by modifying my search engine to ignore the word 'geico'. Should some person seeking car insurance enter 'geico' as their search term, they would then recieve the following results:
Your search - Geico - did not match any documents.
No pages were found containing "Geico".

Suggestions:

- Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
- Try different keywords.
- Try more general keywords.
Also, you can try Google Answers for expert help with your search.
And to be perfectly honest, I'm not a bit surprised that there has been no run on advertising containing 'King of Fools'. If my competitors do not fear me, they at least fear the Royal Legal Team (RLT).
Trackbacks
The trackback URL for this entry is:
http://king-of-fools.com/blog/trackback/1522/TFDORlyj/
  1. Geico vs. Google
    This is a dumb move (via The King of Fools)... Washington Post - Geico Corp. yesterday urged a federal judge in Alexandria to issue an injunction prohibiting Internet giant Google Inc. from selling ads based on searches using the Washington insuran...
    Tracked by: Say Anything on 12/14/2004 at 12:41 pm
Comments
Posted by: Mark J - 05:37 AM - 12/14

Maybe the yellow pages shouldn’t put the ads for other car insurance companies near Geico’s ads either.

Some people take the notion of “intellectual property” a bit far.

Posted by: Bill Wallo - 08:25 AM - 12/14

I wish the RLT worked for bananas, but then I’m sure my return would be legal defense by a troop of monkeys. 

Great point on the Yellow Pages, Bill.  Perhaps Geico will get their own page next time.

Posted by: - 03:26 PM - 12/14
Post Your Comment
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Categories
Archives
August 2010
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Complete Archives

Tools
Search:
  Advanced Search

Mailing List:



Currently Reading
Recently Read
Animal Farm

Animal Farm
George Orwell

Life of Pi

Life of Pi
Yann Martel

The Fourth K

The Fourth K
Mario Puzo

Catch 22

Catch 22
Joseph Heller

the Sicilian

the Sicilian
Mario Puzo

The Quantum Rose

The Quantum Rose
Catherine Asaro

Members
Sponsors
Blogroll
Links
Stats
Entries: 2147
Comments: 2925
Trackbacks: 665
Members: 258

Most Recent:
  Entry: 11/09/08 9:38
  Comment: 11/17/08 12:27
  Visitor: 08/01/10 3:18

Powered by:
  ExpressionEngine

Extreme Tracking