November 18, 2003
New information in the form of internal Democratic Party memos has exposed some pretty serious manipulation of the panel for the Michigan Affirmative Action case:
Senate Democratic staffers and a judge appointed by President Carter made extraordinary efforts last year to ensure that a liberal majority sat on the federal appeals court that heard the Michigan affirmative action cases, according to internal Democratic staff memos.

The manipulation appears to have come from two sources. First (and most significant) was the involvement of long-time senator and member of the Judiciary Committee, Senator Edward M. Kennedy:

Staffers for Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat and senior member of the Judiciary Committee, sought to delay one of President Bush's nominees to the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals based on concerns that the new judge might strike racial preferences as unconstitutional, according to the memos obtained last week by The Washington Times.

"The thinking is that the current 6th Circuit will sustain the affirmative action program, but if a new judge with conservative views is confirmed before the case is decided, that new judge will be able, under 6th Circuit rules, to review the case and vote on it," staffers wrote in an April 17, 2002, memo to Mr. Kennedy advising him to slow the confirmation process for Tennessee Judge Julia S. Gibbons.

The act of manipulating the confirmation process in order to help ensure a specific outcome in a pending case can only be defined as obstruction of justice. If this abuse of power can be proven, Senator Kennedy should be stripped of his committeeship. The Senate Ethics Committee should also probe the situation, although most Americans have little faith in that committee accomplishing anything constructive.

The second source was then-6th Circuit Chief Judge Boyce F. Martin. It appears that Martin's gross manipulation of the judicial panel guaranteed the result which he desired:

The accusations against Judge Martin came from, among others, a 6th Circuit colleague who wrote an unusual appendix to his dissenting opinion. In his dissent, Judge Danny Boggs said Judge Martin — who was appointed to the bench in 1979 by President Carter and who was the circuit's chief judge at the time it heard the Michigan case — violated several court rules by naming himself to the panel hearing the case.

"Under this court's rules, these cases generally would have been assigned to a panel chosen at random," Judge Boggs wrote in his May 2002 dissent. "This was not done."

More alarming to court watchers, however, was evidence that Judge Martin had postponed the affirmative action case until two Republican-appointed judges had retired from active duty.

According to Judge Boggs and an internal investigation by the court that followed, the 6th Circuit was first petitioned May 14, 2001. Actively serving on the court at that time were Judge Alan E. Norris, appointed by President Reagan in 1986, and Judge Richard F. Suhrheinrich, appointed by President Bush in 1990.

After "a series of decisions in contravention of our rules and policies," Judges Norris and Suhrheinrich retired from active duty.

Eight days after Judge Suhrheinrich retired, Judge Martin referred the case to the panel. The newly constructed panel voted 5-4 to uphold the University of Michigan Law School's affirmative-action program. The Supreme Court later upheld that decision, while striking down affirmative action in the university's undergraduate program.

Also absent from the appeals panel that decided the case was Judge Gibbons, who had been nominated eight months earlier. Less than two months after the affirmative-action decision, the Senate confirmed Judge Gibbons.

The initial response by the Democratic Party was a complaint about the release of confidential documents and a demand for investigation of this leak. They did not address the serious issues that these documents raise.

I think the words of President James Garfield address this issue better than anything I could say:

Now more than ever before, the people are responsible for the character of their Congress. If that body be ignorant, reckless, and corrupt, it is because the people tolerate ignorance, recklessness, and corruption. If it be intelligent, brave, and pure, it is because the people demand these high qualities to represent them in the national legislature...
Categories
Archives
March 2010
S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Complete Archives

Tools
Search:
  Advanced Search

Mailing List:



Currently Reading
Recently Read
Animal Farm

Animal Farm
George Orwell

Life of Pi

Life of Pi
Yann Martel

The Fourth K

The Fourth K
Mario Puzo

Catch 22

Catch 22
Joseph Heller

the Sicilian

the Sicilian
Mario Puzo

The Quantum Rose

The Quantum Rose
Catherine Asaro

Members
Sponsors
Blogroll
Links
Stats
Entries: 2147
Comments: 2925
Trackbacks: 665
Members: 258

Most Recent:
  Entry: 11/09/08 9:38
  Comment: 11/17/08 12:27
  Visitor: 03/18/10 5:05

Powered by:
  ExpressionEngine

Extreme Tracking