Doesn't Sound Planned to Me
MyWay news (which is pretty cool) delivers foul news from the Judicial Branch.
A federal judge Tuesday declared the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act unconstitutional, saying the measure infringes on a woman's right to choose.

The ruling applies to Planned Parenthood clinics and their doctors, who perform roughly half the nation's abortions.

In her ruling, Judge Phyllis Hamilton wrote "The act poses an undue burden on a woman's right to choose an abortion". Perhaps she doesn't understand what partial-birth abortion actually involves. Kevin McCullogh gives a pretty detailed (and graphic) analysis here. (June 1 @ 2:19pm - Kevin needs permalinks badly.)

If the mother's life is in danger, there is no way a doctor who is concerned about her health would recommend or perform this procedure. Instead he would rush her into surgery and perform a C-section. The only negative about that procedure (according to Planned Parenthood and their supporters) is that the child is almost always extracted in a living state.

With the birth control options available today followed by nine months of opportunity to legally choose to terminate an unborn child, banning the option to destroy a child within one inch of its (legal) life does not infringe on a woman's right to choose.

Planned Parenthood indeed.

More like Planned Barrenhood.

Trackbacks
The trackback URL for this entry is:
http://king-of-fools.com/blog/trackback/805/AeZbJ1rN/
  1. Submitted for Your Approval
    First off...  any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here, and here.  Die spambots, die!  And now...  here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher's Council for this week's vote. Council links:More Idi...
    Tracked by: : Watcher of Weasels on 06/01/2004 at 6:57 pm
Comments

It’s there, you just have to dig: Permalink to Kevin’s article.

Call me the “Permalinkinator,” you know you want to.

Regarding partial birth abortion being “necessary” to save the mother’s life, here’s what I said back in November:

Newsflash: if the mother is about to die, why would you take the time to fire up the ultrasound (needed for finding the infant’s foot so it can be grabbed by forceps and yanked out), partially deliver the baby, jam the scissors into its skull, fire up the suction device, slurp out its brains, then crush its skull and complete the delivery? You WOULDN’T.  If the mother’s life is in danger, and the baby needs to be out NOW, a doctor can literally perform an emergency C-section in 30 seconds. There is no circumstance when the mother’s need to kill her baby is greater than her need to live.
Posted by: Mark J - 08:02 PM - 06/01

Thanks for the permalink (I honestly took a glance through his page source last week in an attempt to link to him) and the added content to the discussion.

Posted by: King of Fools - 08:38 PM - 06/01

Actually, if you need an emergency c-section without damaging the mother’s internal organs, the best you can hope for is about 4 minutes to get the baby “clear” of the mother.

Been there, done that, set records.

Posted by: Lucy - 06:52 AM - 06/02

Just be thankful you are not this woman.

Posted by: King of Fools - 12:07 PM - 06/02
Post Your Comment
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Categories
Archives
August 2010
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Complete Archives

Tools
Search:
  Advanced Search

Mailing List:



Currently Reading
Recently Read
Animal Farm

Animal Farm
George Orwell

Life of Pi

Life of Pi
Yann Martel

The Fourth K

The Fourth K
Mario Puzo

Catch 22

Catch 22
Joseph Heller

the Sicilian

the Sicilian
Mario Puzo

The Quantum Rose

The Quantum Rose
Catherine Asaro

Members
Sponsors
Blogroll
Links
Stats
Entries: 2147
Comments: 2925
Trackbacks: 665
Members: 258

Most Recent:
  Entry: 11/09/08 9:38
  Comment: 11/17/08 12:27
  Visitor: 08/01/10 3:18

Powered by:
  ExpressionEngine

Extreme Tracking