February 26, 2004
James over at Outside the Beltway takes a fresh approach to the whole idea of amending the constitution:
If we're going to amend the Constitution so regularly, I'd much prefer that we do it in the manner actually prescribed in the Constitution, with a supermajority of the representatives of the people in Congress and three quarters of the states having their say, rather than have it done by unelected judges. Indeed, I find this whole discussion ironic, since George W. Bush has infinitely less power to amend the Constitution than does Sandra Day O'Connor.
This is just his ending paragraph. For context, you had best go read the whole thing.
